The Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy

F Roosma, W van Oorschot, J Gelissen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When analysing the legitimacy of the welfare state, perceptions of the overuse and underuse of welfare are of great importance. Previous literature suggests that many people perceive overuse (misuse or fraud), and there is evidence that people also perceive underuse (non-take-up) of welfare benefits. Perceptions of overuse have therefore been called ‘the Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy'. We analyse data from the European Social Survey for 25 countries and investigate the occurrence and the individual and contextual determinants of overuse and underuse perceptions. We find that both overuse and underuse perceptions are prevalent in all European countries. However, whereas overuse perceptions are more related to ideology, collective images of welfare recipients and selective welfare regimes, underuse perceptions are more shaped by self-interest and the levels of unemployment and social spending in a country. Instead of one Achilles' heel, welfare state legitimacy seems to have two weak spots.Key words: Benefit abuse, European Social Survey, non-take-up, welfare attitudes, welfare states
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-196
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this

Roosma, F ; van Oorschot, W ; Gelissen, J. / The Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 177-196.
@article{f38f843ae4884bacaae07ef5d8ffde2d,
title = "The Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy",
abstract = "When analysing the legitimacy of the welfare state, perceptions of the overuse and underuse of welfare are of great importance. Previous literature suggests that many people perceive overuse (misuse or fraud), and there is evidence that people also perceive underuse (non-take-up) of welfare benefits. Perceptions of overuse have therefore been called ‘the Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy'. We analyse data from the European Social Survey for 25 countries and investigate the occurrence and the individual and contextual determinants of overuse and underuse perceptions. We find that both overuse and underuse perceptions are prevalent in all European countries. However, whereas overuse perceptions are more related to ideology, collective images of welfare recipients and selective welfare regimes, underuse perceptions are more shaped by self-interest and the levels of unemployment and social spending in a country. Instead of one Achilles' heel, welfare state legitimacy seems to have two weak spots.Key words: Benefit abuse, European Social Survey, non-take-up, welfare attitudes, welfare states",
author = "F Roosma and {van Oorschot}, W and J Gelissen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2015.1031157",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "177--196",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

The Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy. / Roosma, F; van Oorschot, W; Gelissen, J.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2016, p. 177-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy

AU - Roosma, F

AU - van Oorschot, W

AU - Gelissen, J

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - When analysing the legitimacy of the welfare state, perceptions of the overuse and underuse of welfare are of great importance. Previous literature suggests that many people perceive overuse (misuse or fraud), and there is evidence that people also perceive underuse (non-take-up) of welfare benefits. Perceptions of overuse have therefore been called ‘the Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy'. We analyse data from the European Social Survey for 25 countries and investigate the occurrence and the individual and contextual determinants of overuse and underuse perceptions. We find that both overuse and underuse perceptions are prevalent in all European countries. However, whereas overuse perceptions are more related to ideology, collective images of welfare recipients and selective welfare regimes, underuse perceptions are more shaped by self-interest and the levels of unemployment and social spending in a country. Instead of one Achilles' heel, welfare state legitimacy seems to have two weak spots.Key words: Benefit abuse, European Social Survey, non-take-up, welfare attitudes, welfare states

AB - When analysing the legitimacy of the welfare state, perceptions of the overuse and underuse of welfare are of great importance. Previous literature suggests that many people perceive overuse (misuse or fraud), and there is evidence that people also perceive underuse (non-take-up) of welfare benefits. Perceptions of overuse have therefore been called ‘the Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy'. We analyse data from the European Social Survey for 25 countries and investigate the occurrence and the individual and contextual determinants of overuse and underuse perceptions. We find that both overuse and underuse perceptions are prevalent in all European countries. However, whereas overuse perceptions are more related to ideology, collective images of welfare recipients and selective welfare regimes, underuse perceptions are more shaped by self-interest and the levels of unemployment and social spending in a country. Instead of one Achilles' heel, welfare state legitimacy seems to have two weak spots.Key words: Benefit abuse, European Social Survey, non-take-up, welfare attitudes, welfare states

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2015.1031157

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2015.1031157

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 177

EP - 196

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 2

ER -