Reframing informal tourism entrepreneurial practices : Capital and field relations structuring the informal tourism economy of Chiang Mai

E Cakmak, R Lie, S McCabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the types of capitals possessed by informal tourism entrepreneurs and locates their value within the field relations that orders their contribution to the tourism system. Bourdieu's theory on fields and capitals was applied to ethnographic narrative accounts of stakeholders in tourism in Chiang Mai, Thailand to assess these roles. Informal entrepreneurs have limited access to resources and their perspectives are excluded from academic debates and policy initiatives. The paper identifies the dynamism, positive social capital, flexibility, and symbolic capital of informal entrepreneurs. These are related to the field conditions that determine and structure their contribution to tourism destinations. The analysis reveals the importance of collaboration between informal entrepreneurs and other stakeholders, concluding with recommendations for policy makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-47
JournalAnnals of Tourism Research
Volume72
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • informal tourism economy
  • entrepreneurship
  • fields
  • capitals
  • Bourdieu
  • Thailand
  • Fields
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Capitals
  • Informal tourism economy

Cite this

@article{d5c7be1eab244b739010dca3500a8aff,
title = "Reframing informal tourism entrepreneurial practices : Capital and field relations structuring the informal tourism economy of Chiang Mai",
abstract = "This article examines the types of capitals possessed by informal tourism entrepreneurs and locates their value within the field relations that orders their contribution to the tourism system. Bourdieu's theory on fields and capitals was applied to ethnographic narrative accounts of stakeholders in tourism in Chiang Mai, Thailand to assess these roles. Informal entrepreneurs have limited access to resources and their perspectives are excluded from academic debates and policy initiatives. The paper identifies the dynamism, positive social capital, flexibility, and symbolic capital of informal entrepreneurs. These are related to the field conditions that determine and structure their contribution to tourism destinations. The analysis reveals the importance of collaboration between informal entrepreneurs and other stakeholders, concluding with recommendations for policy makers.",
keywords = "informal tourism economy, entrepreneurship, fields, capitals, Bourdieu, Thailand, Fields, Entrepreneurship, Capitals, Informal tourism economy",
author = "E Cakmak and R Lie and S McCabe",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.annals.2018.06.003",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "37--47",
journal = "Annals of Tourism Research",
issn = "0160-7383",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Reframing informal tourism entrepreneurial practices : Capital and field relations structuring the informal tourism economy of Chiang Mai. / Cakmak, E; Lie, R; McCabe, S.

In: Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 72, 2018, p. 37-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reframing informal tourism entrepreneurial practices : Capital and field relations structuring the informal tourism economy of Chiang Mai

AU - Cakmak, E

AU - Lie, R

AU - McCabe, S

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article examines the types of capitals possessed by informal tourism entrepreneurs and locates their value within the field relations that orders their contribution to the tourism system. Bourdieu's theory on fields and capitals was applied to ethnographic narrative accounts of stakeholders in tourism in Chiang Mai, Thailand to assess these roles. Informal entrepreneurs have limited access to resources and their perspectives are excluded from academic debates and policy initiatives. The paper identifies the dynamism, positive social capital, flexibility, and symbolic capital of informal entrepreneurs. These are related to the field conditions that determine and structure their contribution to tourism destinations. The analysis reveals the importance of collaboration between informal entrepreneurs and other stakeholders, concluding with recommendations for policy makers.

AB - This article examines the types of capitals possessed by informal tourism entrepreneurs and locates their value within the field relations that orders their contribution to the tourism system. Bourdieu's theory on fields and capitals was applied to ethnographic narrative accounts of stakeholders in tourism in Chiang Mai, Thailand to assess these roles. Informal entrepreneurs have limited access to resources and their perspectives are excluded from academic debates and policy initiatives. The paper identifies the dynamism, positive social capital, flexibility, and symbolic capital of informal entrepreneurs. These are related to the field conditions that determine and structure their contribution to tourism destinations. The analysis reveals the importance of collaboration between informal entrepreneurs and other stakeholders, concluding with recommendations for policy makers.

KW - informal tourism economy

KW - entrepreneurship

KW - fields

KW - capitals

KW - Bourdieu

KW - Thailand

KW - Fields

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Capitals

KW - Informal tourism economy

U2 - 10.1016/j.annals.2018.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.annals.2018.06.003

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 37

EP - 47

JO - Annals of Tourism Research

JF - Annals of Tourism Research

SN - 0160-7383

ER -