Neural responses to facial attractiveness : event-related potentials differentiate between salience and valence effects⁠.

H Revers, K Van Deun, J Vroomen, Marcel Bastiaansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examined the neural correlates of facial attractiveness by presenting pictures of male or female faces (neutral expression) with low/intermediate/high attractiveness to 48 male or female participants while recording their electroencephalogram (EEG). Subjective attractiveness ratings were used to determine the 10% highest, 10% middlemost, and 10% lowest rated faces for each individual participant to allow for high contrast comparisons. These were then split into preferred and dispreferred gender categories. ERP components P1, N1, P2, N2, early posterior negativity (EPN), P300 and late positive potential (LPP) (up until 3000 ms post-stimulus), and the face specific N170 were analysed. A salience effect (attractive/unattractive > intermediate) in an early LPP interval (450–850 ms) and a long-lasting valence related effect (attractive > unattractive) in a late LPP interval (1000–3000 ms) were elicited by the preferred gender faces but not by the dispreferred gender faces. Multi-variate pattern analysis (MVPA)-classifications on whole-brain single-trial EEG patterns further confirmed these salience and valence effects. It is concluded that, facial attractiveness elicits neural responses that are indicative of valenced experiences, but only if these faces are considered relevant. These experiences take time to develop and last well beyond the interval that is commonly explored.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108549
JournalBiological Psychology
Volume179
Issue numberApril
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Keywords

  • Classification
  • EEG
  • Emotion
  • ERP
  • LPP
  • MVPA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neural responses to facial attractiveness : event-related potentials differentiate between salience and valence effects⁠.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this