Identifying dominant stakeholder perspectives on urban freight policies: A q-analysis on urban consolidation centres in The Netherlands

R. Van Duin, M. Slabbekoorn, L. Tavasszy, H. Quak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cities’ sustainability strategies seem to aim at the reduction of the negative impacts of urban freight transport. In the past decades, many public and private initiatives have struggled to gain broad stakeholder support and thus remain viable. Researchers and practitioners have only recently recognised stakeholder acceptance of urban freight solutions as a challenge. A first step in achieving convergence is to understand stakeholder needs, preferences and viewpoints. This paper proposes and applies an approach to identify the main stakeholder perspectives in the domain of urban freight transport. We use Q-methodology, which originates from social sciences and psychology, to record subjective positions and identify the dominant ones. We explain the approach, operationalise the method for the domain of urban freight transport and apply it to stakeholder groups in the Netherlands. We find four dominant perspectives, reflecting how stakeholders normally take positions in the urban freight dialogue. Important findings concern disparities between industry associations and some of their membership, divergent views about the expected role of public administration, and the observation that the behaviour of shippers and Logistics Service Providers (LSP) appears to be inconsistent with their beliefs. All these factors together can act as a barrier to the implementation of urban freight consolidation concepts. The Q-methodology is valuable for eliciting perspectives in urban freight and is a promising tool to facilitate stakeholder dialogue and, eventually, convergence. © 2017 The Author(s). Published by VGTU Press.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)867-880
Number of pages14
JournalTransport Reviews
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • City logistics
  • Perspectives
  • Q-methodology
  • Stakeholders
  • Urban consolidation centres
  • Urban freight transport
  • Freight transportation
  • Public administration
  • Urban consolidation
  • Urban transportation

Cite this

@article{c547086ffd884daaae43a41510bf00f0,
title = "Identifying dominant stakeholder perspectives on urban freight policies: A q-analysis on urban consolidation centres in The Netherlands",
abstract = "Cities’ sustainability strategies seem to aim at the reduction of the negative impacts of urban freight transport. In the past decades, many public and private initiatives have struggled to gain broad stakeholder support and thus remain viable. Researchers and practitioners have only recently recognised stakeholder acceptance of urban freight solutions as a challenge. A first step in achieving convergence is to understand stakeholder needs, preferences and viewpoints. This paper proposes and applies an approach to identify the main stakeholder perspectives in the domain of urban freight transport. We use Q-methodology, which originates from social sciences and psychology, to record subjective positions and identify the dominant ones. We explain the approach, operationalise the method for the domain of urban freight transport and apply it to stakeholder groups in the Netherlands. We find four dominant perspectives, reflecting how stakeholders normally take positions in the urban freight dialogue. Important findings concern disparities between industry associations and some of their membership, divergent views about the expected role of public administration, and the observation that the behaviour of shippers and Logistics Service Providers (LSP) appears to be inconsistent with their beliefs. All these factors together can act as a barrier to the implementation of urban freight consolidation concepts. The Q-methodology is valuable for eliciting perspectives in urban freight and is a promising tool to facilitate stakeholder dialogue and, eventually, convergence. {\circledC} 2017 The Author(s). Published by VGTU Press.",
keywords = "City logistics, Perspectives, Q-methodology, Stakeholders, Urban consolidation centres, Urban freight transport, Freight transportation, Public administration, Urban consolidation, Urban transportation",
author = "{Van Duin}, R. and M. Slabbekoorn and L. Tavasszy and H. Quak",
note = "Cited By :5 Export Date: 21 November 2019",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.3846/16484142.2017.1350996",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "867--880",
journal = "Transport Reviews",
issn = "0144-1647",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

Identifying dominant stakeholder perspectives on urban freight policies: A q-analysis on urban consolidation centres in The Netherlands. / Van Duin, R.; Slabbekoorn, M.; Tavasszy, L.; Quak, H.

In: Transport Reviews, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2018, p. 867-880.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying dominant stakeholder perspectives on urban freight policies: A q-analysis on urban consolidation centres in The Netherlands

AU - Van Duin, R.

AU - Slabbekoorn, M.

AU - Tavasszy, L.

AU - Quak, H.

N1 - Cited By :5 Export Date: 21 November 2019

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Cities’ sustainability strategies seem to aim at the reduction of the negative impacts of urban freight transport. In the past decades, many public and private initiatives have struggled to gain broad stakeholder support and thus remain viable. Researchers and practitioners have only recently recognised stakeholder acceptance of urban freight solutions as a challenge. A first step in achieving convergence is to understand stakeholder needs, preferences and viewpoints. This paper proposes and applies an approach to identify the main stakeholder perspectives in the domain of urban freight transport. We use Q-methodology, which originates from social sciences and psychology, to record subjective positions and identify the dominant ones. We explain the approach, operationalise the method for the domain of urban freight transport and apply it to stakeholder groups in the Netherlands. We find four dominant perspectives, reflecting how stakeholders normally take positions in the urban freight dialogue. Important findings concern disparities between industry associations and some of their membership, divergent views about the expected role of public administration, and the observation that the behaviour of shippers and Logistics Service Providers (LSP) appears to be inconsistent with their beliefs. All these factors together can act as a barrier to the implementation of urban freight consolidation concepts. The Q-methodology is valuable for eliciting perspectives in urban freight and is a promising tool to facilitate stakeholder dialogue and, eventually, convergence. © 2017 The Author(s). Published by VGTU Press.

AB - Cities’ sustainability strategies seem to aim at the reduction of the negative impacts of urban freight transport. In the past decades, many public and private initiatives have struggled to gain broad stakeholder support and thus remain viable. Researchers and practitioners have only recently recognised stakeholder acceptance of urban freight solutions as a challenge. A first step in achieving convergence is to understand stakeholder needs, preferences and viewpoints. This paper proposes and applies an approach to identify the main stakeholder perspectives in the domain of urban freight transport. We use Q-methodology, which originates from social sciences and psychology, to record subjective positions and identify the dominant ones. We explain the approach, operationalise the method for the domain of urban freight transport and apply it to stakeholder groups in the Netherlands. We find four dominant perspectives, reflecting how stakeholders normally take positions in the urban freight dialogue. Important findings concern disparities between industry associations and some of their membership, divergent views about the expected role of public administration, and the observation that the behaviour of shippers and Logistics Service Providers (LSP) appears to be inconsistent with their beliefs. All these factors together can act as a barrier to the implementation of urban freight consolidation concepts. The Q-methodology is valuable for eliciting perspectives in urban freight and is a promising tool to facilitate stakeholder dialogue and, eventually, convergence. © 2017 The Author(s). Published by VGTU Press.

KW - City logistics

KW - Perspectives

KW - Q-methodology

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Urban consolidation centres

KW - Urban freight transport

KW - Freight transportation

KW - Public administration

KW - Urban consolidation

KW - Urban transportation

U2 - 10.3846/16484142.2017.1350996

DO - 10.3846/16484142.2017.1350996

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 867

EP - 880

JO - Transport Reviews

JF - Transport Reviews

SN - 0144-1647

IS - 4

ER -