Een systematische evaluatie van de mythe die bestaat ten aanzien van generatieverschillen op de werkvloer - Een commentaar op Stassen, Anseel en Levecque. [A systematic evaluation of the myth that exists in relation to generational differences at work – A commentary on Stassen, Anseel & Levecque]

XD Lub, J Van der Smissen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This article comments on the article on the myth of generational differences in the workplace by Stassen, Anseel and Levecque published in this journal. We reflect on a number of topics: Is the concept of generations a myth or a hype (no); the contribution of Stassen et al.‘s article to the body of knowledge on generations (limited); a discussion of research methods and conceptualization (we suggest other methods and other questions to ask); and the added value of research on generations in the workplace to managers and HR professionals. In this commentary, we do not just comment on the article by Stassen et al., but propose a number of alternative approaches of the problem. Finally, we argue that generational research, albeit with limitations, is relevant for managers and HR professionals, if only for adding a socio-cultural frame of reference to the discussion in organizations on how diversity in organizations can be better understood and used.

Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)77-86
Number of pages10
JournalGedrag & Organisatie
Volume29
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • age
  • generations
  • research methods

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Een systematische evaluatie van de mythe die bestaat ten aanzien van generatieverschillen op de werkvloer - Een commentaar op Stassen, Anseel en Levecque. [A systematic evaluation of the myth that exists in relation to generational differences at work – A commentary on Stassen, Anseel & Levecque]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this