Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research

C.M. Hall, B. Amelung, S.A. Cohen, E Eijgelaar, S. Gössling, J.E.S. Higham, R. Leemans, PM Peeters, Y. Ram, D. Scott, C. Aall, B. Abegg, J.E. Araña, S. Barr, S. Becken, R. Buckley, P. Burns, T. Coles, J. Dawson, R. DoranG. Dubois, D.T. Duval, D. Fennell, A.M. Gill, M. Gren, W. Gronau, J. Guiver, D. Hopkins, E.H. Huijbens, K Koens, M. Lamers, C. Lemieux, A. Lew, P. Long, F Melissen, J Nawijn, S. Nicholls, J.H. Nilsson, R. Nunkoo, A. Pomering, A.C. Reis, D. Reiser, R.B. Richardson, C.M. Rogerson, J Saarinen, A.D. Sæþórsdóttir, R. Steiger, P. Upham, S. Linden, G. Visser, G. Wall, D. Weaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This final response to the two climate change denial papers by Shani and Arad further highlights the inaccuracies, misinformation and errors in their commentaries. The obfuscation of scientific research and the consensus on anthropogenic climate change may have significant long-term negative consequences for better understanding the implications of climate change and climate policy for tourism and create confusion and delay in developing and implementing tourism sector responses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)352-356
Number of pages5
JournalTourism Management
Volume47
Issue numberApril
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Agnotology
  • Climate change
  • Denial
  • Global warming
  • Skepticism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this